By now you probably know that Proposition 203, the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act appears to have passed after all (although the final determination will actually be made when the election is certified). The Act identifies the ADHS as the organization that’s responsible for carrying out the provisions of the law. There will be several teams of folks here at ADHS that’ll be working hard during the next 4 months or so as we set up the regulatory network.
We’ve set up a featured site on our homepage that’ll be our information hub for communicating with the public as we make decisions in preparation for implementing the Act. The website contains (and will continue to contain) all of the relevant public information that we’ll have regarding our implementation activities. You can also sign up to receive weekly updates on the site.
Implementing the Act will take at least 4 months… and we expect to be able to accept our first applications for medical marijuana cards and dispensaries in early April, 2011. In the mean time, we’ll be developing the Administrative Code (Rules) for actually operating and regulating the program. Here is our schedule for Rule development:
December 17, 2010: ADHS posts an initial informal draft of the Rules
December 17, 2010 – January 7, 2011: ADHS receives informal (electronic) public comment on the initial informal draft rules
January 31, 2011: ADHS posts official draft Rules for public comment
January 31, 2011 – February 18, 2011: ADHS receive public comment on a revised draft of the rules
February 15 – 17, 2011: ADHS holds 3 public meetings about the draft rules
Phoenix, Tuesday, February 15, 2011 – 1 pm, 250 N 17th Ave
Tucson, Wednesday, February, 16, 2011 – 1 pm, 400 W. Congress, Room 222
Phoenix, Thursday, February 17, 2011 – 1 pm, 250 N 17th Ave
March 28, 2011: ADHS publishes the final Rules that will be used to implement the Act
April 2011: ADHS begins to accept applications for registry identification cards and for dispensary certificates
Our goal is to put together a responsible set of regulations between now and April 2011 with the rule package that will capture the core of the Initiative’s intent while placing some checks and balances in the system to prevent some of the excesses that have occurred in other states that have medical marijuana laws (CO, CA, MT etc.). I also want to make sure that our implementation activities are completely transparent and that everybody has equal access to information. By using an inclusive proves we will also ensure that we are getting the best input we can as we implement this new program.
Dear Mr. Humble,
Thank you for acting swiftly to the current developments of this new ACT. I am looking forward to the future progress of this implementation. I will be attending the planned public meetings you have tentatively scheduled. Hopefully you will be taking citizen feedback on how to implement the new laws and how to structure the setup. I’m sure the team of lawyers will help, but I feel the bottom line should be drawn at what the citizens ultimately want, in accordance with current law and the initiative that is.
A few small considerations for rules pertaining to this act I believe will be fairly heated:
– Residency requirements for dispensary licensing and agents
– Zoning restrictions
– Dispensary certification availability and the selection of qualified residents
– Associated fees for the application as well as for the certification itself ( one in the same or a different fee schedule, application fee refundable if no license is given, etc.)
– Number of plants each dispensary is allowed to cultivate as well as total allotted amount of usable Cannabis flowers allowed on premises for distribution.
– A definition to an “enclosed locked area” ( does it need a roof? Green house or indoor hydro systems only for security, or are fields going to be allowed)
– Will other Cannabis related medications be allowed to be developed for patient use? ie oils, balms and lotions.
Just a few concerns for you to add to the looming pile of work that is ahead of you guys. I also wanted to take this time to thank you for setting up this blog and the special consideration you are making on this proposition. If you keep up the same integrity of work with this initiative as you have so far with all of your other duties as Director, I will rest assured that the job will be done with the utmost integrity and concern for the public welfare. Thanks again Will. Keep up the good work.
Andrew Lazar
Mr. Lazar-
Thanks so much for your input, it is appreciated.
We have a great team in place that will be working on the rules and regulations on proposition 203 for about the next 120 days, and I am confident that they will take all things into consideration. Please visit our website at http://www.azdhs.gov , and sign up to receive up to date information via email.
Thanks
I’ve read the 3 possible options of license distribution. 1st come 1st serve is a terrible method, as you probably agree. You’ll have 100s campin out in front of the state building the night before applications are taken. A drawing of licenses is a bit fairer, but would have to be set up in districts. in order to spread the licenses throughout the state, similar to the way deer permits are drawn by sectors. Still, this method wouldn’t insure the best candidates for the license. The 3rd method of choosing the best candidates by their business plans, etc. is the fairest method but would bring on lawsuits from a few of the rejected applications. Part of the process should include state residency so people can’t come from out of state soley to start a dispensary. 2 to 3 yr minimum residency would help weed out these people. You have your hands full with this dilemma as you will probably receive 5 times the applications as licenses available.
i think consideration should be given to those with documented medical conditions that want to open dispensaries- (content removed by editor)
Mike-
There are no medical marijuana dispensaries in the State of Arizona at this time, as we haven’t even written the rules and regulations yet and will be doing so within the next 120 days. Please visit our website at http://www.azdhs.gov for up to date information.
I hope there is consideration for rural medical marijuana patients, i.e., paraplegics to make Medical marijuana accessible by mail…also to keep costs down for those who have little or no income. Thank you Dr. T
Jeff-
Thanks so much for your input, we really appreciate it!
Above Jeff makes a very good point I think – although problematic given US mail and federal restrictions on mailing any form of marijuana though commercial carriers.
A great option would be to allow registered dispensary agents to deliver to registered patients and caregivers ONLY after verification through the online system AT THE TIME of delivery (can be done remotely in real time) AND after positive identification of the individual as would be done in the actual dispensary.
Mike
Thank you Mr. Humble for putting together an effective way to communicate with everyone interested in keeping up with the Medical Marijuana dispensary license applications as well as the applications for the patients & designated caregivers. One question I have is how are you going to license the dispensary agents?
If a dispensary agent fills out their application form and sends it in, and is going to be working (either as a paid or volunteer employee) for a dispensary that is pending a license will you grant provisional status to that dispensary agent? The provisional status would allow dispensary agents to work with the patients and caregivers and help them with their cultivation and other medical marijuana needs.
I think this “provisional status” would be in effect until either the dispensary is licensed (provisional status would now be full status) or the dispensary license would be denied and then the dispensary agent would have to surrender their Registry Identification Card within 7 days to your department.
I hope you are working on this because the Dispensary Agents should be allowed to cultivate the same amount of plants as a Designated Caregiver maximum (60 plants).
The focus should remain on serving patients in need. Home delivery by dispensary agents should be allowed for those patients who need it and request it. Home delivery may be desirable because the patient lacks a caregiver, transportation, is homebound, of advanced age or any registered patient who is seriously ill, in severe pain or dying. This allows patients to maintain privacy, dignity, independence, and gives them better ability to manage their pain and symptoms without having to depend on others. It serves the public by minimizing risks impaired driving by medicated or frail patients. If registered patients are issued Picture ID cards with their information and unique registration numbers, dispensary agents can confirm current registration and information regarding acquisition limits by mobile or smart phones prior to delivery.
The best way to answer all of these questions/comments, is to direct you to our website’s frequently asked questions information sheet (follow the link below). We appreciate all of your input, it is much appreciated and needed.
Thanks,
Will
http://www.azdhs.gov/prop203/documents/Frequently%20Asked%20Questions.pdf
After April 2011, how can dispensaries provide medicine when it takes 6 months to a year to grow a crop. It looks like the final timeline should be moved out 6 months to a year (unless the ADHS is going to acquire marijuana, allow it to be purchased from another state and/or obtain the marijuana and provide it to the dispensaries).
I understand what Mike is saying Will- (content removed by editor)
I just reread Section 36-2801 part 11 which already specifically approves a dispensary to “…delivers transfers, transports…marijuana…to cardholders.”
The Department would then only have to deal with regulating the delivery. I believe my prior post is a secure and effective way to ensure proper identification of cardholders and ensure the on-line verification system is utilized to confirm no more than the allowable amount is dispensed. Marijuana would never be out of the hands of a registered cardholder who is subject to Department oversight (patient or dispensary agent).
Mike
hi Will- 1st thanks for taking the time to answer questions in this forum. there are so many questions around this prop and it’s ambiguity in areas…i’m a little guy- i’ve scraped together a decent amount of money in an attempt to hopefully realize one of my dreams with the passage of this prop- i have had Crohn’s Disease for 21 years and have talked to a lot of people with Crohn’s who hasve been helped by medicinal marijuana. i really hope some consideration can be given to floks like us who really are in it for altruistic reasons and not just because we see $$$$. It’s already apparent the big money is pouring in from CA and that these people are in it solely for the money. We plan on putting together a solid application and have a great business plan. i just hoping we will be able to compete- some of what i’ve been hearing 1- the $5,000 applicaiton fee will be non-refundable if you are not granted a license and 2- that we will have to have a location for the dispensary and grow op prior to application- puts little guys like me at a huge disadvantage. Basically this means i’ll have to secure a lease for 2 facilities in addition to the $5,000 fee. is this correct?
Also has any thought been given to where the initial “product” will come from? The prop says dispensaries will have to grow or buy from another licensed dispensary…does thismean they can purchase from an out of state dispensary? if not how will the 1st “product” legally enter the state?
thanks so much for your time!
Mitch
Reading the Arizona Capitol Times article this morning I’m glad you are being pro-active on this issue Mr. Humble but please do not overstep your authority in implementing this soon to be State law that garnered more votes than Jan Brewer did for governor.
I don’t think you have the authority to tell doctors they have to counsel their patients on alternatives such as acupuncture and biofeedback. People are not going for abortion counseling where by law they are to be given alternatives. If you feel patients need all the facts, I hope you tell the doctors to recommend marijuana when a patient wants a prescription for Oxycontin, after all, medical marijuana is a safe alternative with no deaths reported from ingesting it. Opiates can not make this claim so please just do your job and implement the program. You do not have authority in your capacity to tell doctors how to recommend medicine to their patients. That’s for the AMA not Will Humble.
Mr. Humble. My question is will landowners need to apply for a permit or certificate to lease out land for warehouse or cultivation use?
Henry-
We are going to begin to write the rules and have 120 days to do so, we not have answers to your question until rules/regulations are complete.
There have been a lot of good questions brought up on this subject. One question on my mind is if the dispensary will act like a pharmacy and only dispense the marijuana or will they also have an area set up for use? I’d like to hear opinions on this.
Please take into consideration the suggestion that a few have given here—allow for delivery services to service the homebound and terminal patients. There are hundreds of delivery services in CA and OR, and they are the safest and most discreet of all the business models, while also avoiding zoning issues, dispensary robberies, parking issues, etc.
I have just finished reading all the letters here, as well as going to the above website to read all of the Q & A’s
supplied. I must say, I am very impressed with the state of Arizona re: this proposal, and am very anxious to apply for my user card and most likely apply for the operation of a dispensary as well. My partner in the dispensary has many years experience in setting up “not for profit” businesses, including Independent Living Centers for the disabled.
Thanks again,
Brian Garfield (diagnosed 12 years ago with Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis).
I have a question about #6….
which says a caregiver can not be paid labor.
I currently am a caregiver and family member for a paraplegic and Southwest services pays me to clean her home and do her meals and assist her with her day to day activities.
If I also become her marijuana caregiver, will I no longer be able to be paid for her non marijuana day to day assistance?
If so than do I have another family member become her marijuana caregiver?
#6 seems confusing to me
As stated before, we have 120 days to write the rules and regulations and will not have anything concrete until that time.
I heard of a possible fingerprint requirement for both the patient and the caregiver. Is this correct? Currently I am able to get opiates for my patient from a local pharmacy with no fingerprint requirements for either of us. Why would MJ, which is far less dangerous than opiates have such a requirement?
Except for a Qualifying Patient, each person applying to be a cardholder is required to submit a full set of fingerprints to ADHS, as outlined below:
36-2819. Fingerprinting requirements
EACH PERSON APPLYING AS A DESIGNATED CAREGIVER, A PRINCIPAL OFFICER, AGENT OR EMPLOYEE OF A NONPROFIT MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY OR A MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY AGENT SHALL SUBMIT A FULL SET OF FINGERPRINTS TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING A STATE AND FEDERAL CRIMINAL RECORDS CHECK PURSUANT TO SECTION 41-1750 AND PUBLIC LAW 92-544. THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY MAY EXCHANGE THIS FINGERPRINT DATA WITH THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION WITHOUT DISCLOSING THAT THE RECORDS CHECK IS RELATED TO THE MEDICAL MARIJUANA ACT AND ACTS PERMITTED BY IT. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL DESTROY EACH SET OF FINGERPRINTS AFTER THE CRIMINAL RECORDS CHECK IS COMPLETED.
The may comes in, as outlined below, giving ADHS authority to conduct a criminal records check on each person submitting a full set of fingerprints:
36-2804. Registration and certification of nonprofit medical marijuana dispensaries
D. THE DEPARTMENT MAY CONDUCT A CRIMINAL RECORDS CHECK IN ORDER TO CARRY OUT THIS SECTION.
36-2804.01. Registration of nonprofit medical marijuana dispensary agents; notices; civil penalty; classification
E. THE DEPARTMENT MAY CONDUCT A CRIMINAL RECORDS CHECK IN ORDER TO CARRY OUT THIS SECTION.
36-2804.05. Denial of registry identification card
D. THE DEPARTMENT MAY CONDUCT A CRIMINAL RECORDS CHECK OF EACH DESIGNATED CAREGIVER OR NONPROFIT MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARY AGENT APPLICANT TO CARRY OUT THIS SECTION.
I, too, am very impressed with ADHS approach in communications throughout this process. I especially hope the activities of medical marijuana big business is kept transparent. This economy has not been kind to the little guy; therefore, I’m one (applying for a dispensary) whom supports a residency requirement for applicants of 2 or 3 years as mentioned by another blogger. In addition I suggest the applicaton fees be structured at minumum to encourage participation from the small Arizona entreprenuers that will better serve local communities in need of medical marijuana. Congratulations to Will Humble for providing such stellar leadership for this new law and service.
Craig-
Thank you very much!!
i agree with Craig- as another future applicant (and longtime chronic disease sufferer)for a dispensary i hope we “little guys” have a legitimate shot.
Well I hope it doesn’t have a residency of 2 or 3 years because that would totally leave me out of the loop. I didn’t move here for growing……I came for another job that I’m working. But I do agree that the operators should at least be living here and not move here just to start up that kind of business.
We need good growers that can grow some great organic medicine to really help out the people. I for one that will gladly give up what Im doing now for the opportunity to help people out.
Greetings
I would like to start out by stating that I for one am very pleased to see Arizona start to crawl out of the past and into a more modern attitude when it relates to one’s personal responsibility twords health and how one deals with it.
The DHS has a huge job ahead of themselves at this point and I would hope that the rules that end up being put into place will be done in such a manner that adjustments and changes can be injected at any point required. The details and the liabilities are many and great, from dealing with how one is expected to provide for themselves, to the issues concerning quality and possible contaminates that can be introduced in the growing process, to an absolute plethora of other issues.
Another great concern is and must be the cost control. The last thing anyone who needs or requires any medication needs is a bunch of money grubbers who have no intrest in providing medications for anything more than the growth of their wallets. Not for profit would be a better way to head that direction, although it wouldnt be the end all manner as has shown in the past. Its not to hard to give the CEO a salary that is way out of proportion to the actual duties and cost vs benifit provided.
Since this is not the comments and questions forum I will obstain from adding more at this time. But I do look forward to providing input and attending any and all opportunities at the times provided for input from the public to voice my concerns and ideas.
Having been a grower in the past and knowing what issues have been proverbial thorns in the side in past chances to do something really good for the people who need it. I will of course be watching closely as Arizona and the DHS makes a giant step forward in allowing the People of Arizona make choices in how they stay healthy, happy and be the best people they can be.
Best of Luck to DHS and yourself Mr. Humble!
Please for the sake of the “people” keep your eyes on the real prize here. Those that have been doing this for years and felt like ( and were) a criminal for trying to be healthy are watching and we pray that you all use the best judgement possible in this matter.
Thank You,
Looking Forward
There ought to be written in the provision that couriers be allowed to deliver marijuana, without restriction as to how many patients they may deliver to.
Will–I think you need to be aware that many sick individuals out there already have paid caregivers. These caregivers help with meals, procuring meds at the pharmacy, cleaning, doing laundry, helping with bathing, helping with bowell movements. I’m pointing out the difference between a caregiver and a marijuana caregiver that provides marijuana to five of her patients. You need to be aware of that distinction when you are setting up rules for caregivers. As a caregiver my primary duty is to provide for my one and only patient’s needs. I’m not a distributor of marijuana. However, my patient requires marijuana for pain and one of my new and minor caretaking duties will be procuring marijuana for my one and sole patient. So a caretaker has many definitions.
It doesn’t get much better than this. Thanks for keeping us so well informed. I, too, will be applying for a dispensary license. My question is, will the qualifying patient registry identification card have a bar code or magnet that ties the patients twenty digit number and personal information together? Also will the patient be required to show a valid Arizona ID or drivers license?
Thanks, Robert
Robert, our team is currently working on writing the rules for medical marijuana and they have 120 days to do so. These are questions that can’t be answered until everything is finalized. Please visit http://www.azdhs.gov for up to date information. There is also a place where you can subscribe to email alerts, to be updated on medical marijuana information as it becomes available.
Thanks,
Will
I understand the timeline in making the informal to formal laws. Also on the identifcation cards for those patient that are in need Would it not be a benefitual to start doing back ground check on the dispensary applications after the intial imformal draft in Dec. like others have mentioned it takes time to grow if we want this product to come out of az. My other concern is the privacy of the cultivator/dispensary. will address and names be public. we are looking into cultivating but are not ones that need the product personally. my son and father are ill though.
What is it in my proposed post below which the moderator seems to find unacceptable to be posted here and why has it been rejected? What have I stated that isn’t accurate, is offensive or is inappropriate? It seems that the monied elite and their high powered legal challenges I’ve mentioned are already at work inside the Az. Health Dept. Why is freedom of speech being limited here. Please show what of my proposed post is beyond the pale or else allow the public to accept or dismiss my stated opinions. At least contact me at [email protected] and explain why my post below was rejected.
Very shortly after the vote count was announced Terry Gilbert (KFYI) interviewed a well known local attorney, who as she put it is representing some well capitalized parties with experience in the medical marijuana field. It seems rather obvious that these are out of state persons and likely Californians.
There needs to be more than the above suggested 2 or 3 year residency requirement as non-profit status is based on a legal entity which normally has more than one principal and these structures are easily manipulated by having a qualifying straw man. A residency requirement needs to state that all the principals meet the requirement under penalty of perjury. Plain and simple no out of state interest of any kind should be allowed to participate in a dispensary.
This will draw a lot of high powered legal challenges as these out of Staters are already here and not just prepared to spend upwards of $100,000.00 to obtain a license, but are already committed to and spending this level of funds These interest need to be turned back immediately.
Will—I’m hoping that your office will consider a 90 day exemption for dispensaries to get marijuana from CA, or NV until their crops will be gowing…so that medical marijuana will be immediately available once rules are in place and a dispensary is approved…so that patients in need will not have to wait additional months.
Dear Mr. Humble
First and foremost we just wanted to thank you for doing such a great job on such a monumental task. We would also like to thank the Health Department for being so transparent on the stream of information. We have appreciated being able to read all of the responses on your blog; there have been some excellent points to think about and consider implementing.
In response to your blog dated October 29th (Selecting Marijuana Dispensaries)
1) First Come First Serve: This would be unfair to the public. People would be camped out like a Black Friday shopping day, and it would be a circus.
2) Random Drawing: Would probably be the fairest, with certain Criteria having to be met: such as Minimum Residency of least 5 years. Submit business plan, as set forth in prop 203 section 36-2803, along with your application. Geographic location applying for need to be separated by cities.
3) Evaluate Each Application: Great Idea to be able to do that, however I would think the Health Department would be overwhelmed with millions of applications to review and evaluate in a timely manner, with the 120 day period. With outside council the transparency could be compromised not to mention the cost of this council and could open the door for many lawsuits.
We look forward to the upcoming meetings.
D & K – Northern Arizona
Thank you, David.
I did not write this…..where is the post I origionaly put up?
I did not write this..
I, too, am very impressed with ADHS approach in communications throughout this process. I especially hope the activities of medical marijuana big business is kept transparent. This economy has not been kind to the little guy; therefore, I’m one (applying for a dispensary) whom supports a residency requirement for applicants of 2 or 3 years as mentioned by another blogger. In addition I suggest the applicaton fees be structured at minumum to encourage participation from the small Arizona entreprenuers that will better serve local communities in need of medical marijuana. Congratulations to Will Humble for providing such stellar leadership for this new law and service.
Thank you, Craig.
Mr. Humble,
I suffer from chronic pain every day of my life. Aside from life threatening narcotics, marijuana has been the only medication that helps with my symptoms but doesn’t destroy my liver. My doctor is willing to write me a recommendation letter right now and I don’t want to wait another 6 to 9 months for T.P.T.B to come up with “paperwork”. Will his signed letter stating that in his opinion cannabis might work in treating my disease processes protect me from law enforcement while we’re waiting for “official paperwork”?
Thanks so much for this forum,
Dave
Dave,
Please review prop 203, specifically 36-2818(C). You can find the initiative located on our website at http://www.azdhs.gov.
This was a question from November but it had no reply and I was wondering if you could speak to it based on the draft laws:
Also has any thought been given to where the initial “product” will come from? The prop says dispensaries will have to grow or buy from another licensed dispensary…does this mean they can purchase from an out of state dispensary or licensed card holder? if not how will the 1st “product” legally enter the state?
Also I have heard rumors of a 15,000 non refundable application fee. If this true and is the 5000 permit fee refundable if you do not get the permit Thany you very much for your time.
Ryan
Please refer to our FAQ section on the AZDHS website Medial Marijuana FAQ’s.
The draft laws state “come from either qualified patients, caregivers or other licensed dispensaries” but there is no mention of if it can come from out of state. Can it?
Thank you for your quick reply
Ryan
Will-
Thank you for being extremely transparent during this exciting time in Arizona. I agree with many of the others regarding a residency restriction of 2-3 years.
Another question I did have was on the application to create my non-profit I am required to put a business address. I believe I can put anything down there and then, if I get approved for a license, I have 30 days after moving to a real place of business to make an address change with the AZ Corporation Commission? IS that correct? Or am I supposed to secure a business location prior to applying. Are there new zoning laws for this type of business?
To Whom it may concern; I am a 57 year old,white male that has been diagnosed with,IBS,DDD,and Depression,steming from my inability to work,with these conditions.I was assured by my doctor I qualified for a med marij. card. The Pain started in 1998, and is documented by my visits to the emergency rooms of Wickenburg Hosp. and Prescott ‘s Hosp.I do not tolerate chemical painkillers very well. Further complications with an undiagnosed as of yet, skin condition that covers my arms and hands,eczema like, for months after contact with my old work environment.These tough breaks have cost me my profession , my wife, (she ran when she saw the bills), and most of my possesions as I get no SS as of 2 1 2011, and this has forced me into poverty with my only source of income , selling my personal belongings of a lifetime, at the Peddlars Pass Flee Mkt. I propose simply for the sake of poor people everywhere in the state, that some provision is included to prevent the rules from excluding the neediest patients, from the exploitive prices that are bound to be demanded by the dispensaries. I say preserve the 25 mile rule, and extend it to individual exceptions for Indigent cases like mine. This places less of a financial burden on the poor and offers them an alternative to fueing the black market.
From a dispensary point of view: I am happy the State has not put regulations on the number of plants that a dispensary can plant. I realize it will be months before a dispensary can have medical marijuana grown and ready for distribution. Is there a law that prohibits a dispensary authorized to operate from purchasing from an out of state licensed dispensary to get medicie to registared card holders in Arizona quickly while growing our crop?
Michelle Alexander,
Please consult an attorney.
From a caregivers point of view: If I grow 12 plants but the law only authorizes 2.5 ounces every 14 days for the patient what am I suppose to do with all the extra cannibis. How much can I store for his benefit without breaking the law. I do not see anything about this in 92 pages of rules or ARS 32-28
Michelle,
Give it to a dispensary once they are in operation.
From a patient point of view: If the application process is to be done electronically how do you expect disabled people, many who have no computers, scanners, and cameras that connect to computers, and no money for internet access to complete these applications? Many of those who will qualify for medical marijuana have chronic conditions that make using a computer impossable.
Michelle,
Please go to your local library, they have internet/computer access free of charge. As for the photos, look for a place that takes passport photos as they work perfectly. You may also want to bring a friend or family member with you who is computer savvy.
im glad that it is not always about negative publicity about using marijuana in medication. i wish for all of your endeavors. 🙂
Does the guide apply to International businesses?
No
im glad that it is not always about negative publicity about using marijuana in medication. i wish for all of your endeavors.